^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SATISH CHAND MITTAL vs. SALES TAX OFFICER SGST, WARD 25- ZONE 1.
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
SACHIN DATTA

Pet. Counsel

Wahaj Ahmad Khan

Res. Counsel

Avishkar Singhvi

Shubham Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	SATISH CHAND MITTAL
Respondent	SALES TAX OFFICER SGST, WARD 25- ZONE 1.
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Sep 9, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (C) 12589/2024, CM APPLs. 52373/2024 & CM APPL. 52374/2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 10823
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 73

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the order dated 30.12.2023 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 / the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act/ SGST Act), in respect of period from July 2017 to March 2018. The said order was passed pursuant to the Show Cause Notice dated 29.09.2023 (hereafter the impugned SCN). In addition to the impugned SCN, the Adjudicating Authority had also issued a Reminder dated 23.11.2023. 4. It is the petitioner’s case that he had not received the impugned SCN and, therefore, he had no opportunity to respond to the same. For the same reason, the petitioner claims that he had not appear for a personal hearing before the Adjudicating Authority, which was scheduled on 17.10.2023 and lat....