^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SAT SAHIB ENTERPRISES vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PIYUSH AGRAWAL

Pet. Counsel

Praveen Kumar

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	SAT SAHIB ENTERPRISES
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Jul 15, 2024
Order No.	WRIT TAX No. - 1357 of 2019
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 11243
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Heard Shri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.08.2019 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade - 2 (Appeal), V, Commercial Tax, Ghaziabad as well as the order dated 30.06.2018 passed by the respondent no. 3 under section 29(2)(a) of the UP GST Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 30.05.2018, the SIB conducted survey in the business premises of the petitioner, but the books of accounts could not be shown on account of the fact that the Proprietor of the petitioner was out of town. Thereafter, on 04.06.2018, a notice was issued to the petitioner for cancellation of the registration on the ground that at the principal place of business, no activity was found, nor the books of account were produced, to which the petitioner submitted written submission on 13.06.2018. Thereafter, vide impugned ord....