Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

SANTOSH KUMAR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2 AND ANOTHER
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Pet. Counsel
Bipin Kumar Pandey
Res. Counsel
C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant

SANTOSH KUMAR
Respondent ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2 AND ANOTHER
Court Allahabad High Court
State

Uttar Pradesh

Date Oct 11, 2023
Order No.

Writ Tax No. - 1185 of 2022, 1193 of 2022

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8135
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. Since the issues involved in these two writ petitions are similar, therefore, the same are being decided by the common order. 3. The present writ petitions have been filed assailing the order dated 7.1.2022 passed by the respondent no.1 in GST Appeal Nos.67 of 2020 & 66 of 2020, Assessment Year 2018-19 under the provisions of Section 73 of the UP Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, whereby the order passed on 10.07.2020 was confirmed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that prior to commencement of GST regime, the petitioner was registered under the VAT Act as well as under the Service Tax Act under the trade name M/s Akash Enterprises. He further submitted that under the VAT Act, the petitioner is having TIN No.09278704481S and under the Service Tax Act, the pet....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
30
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).