Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

SANAL P vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
AMIT MAHAJAN
Pet. Counsel
Aayush Agrawal
Res. Counsel
Ankur Yadav
Anurag Ojha

Petitioner / Applicant

SANAL P

Respondent UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Court Delhi High Court
State

Delhi

Date Oct 5, 2023
Order No.

W.P.(C) 11738/2023 & CM APPL. 45836/2023

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8065
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

VIBHU BAKHRU, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a Show-Cause Notice (hereafter ‘the SCN’) dated 20.04.2022, calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why his GST registration should not be cancelled. 2. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 15.11.2022, cancelling its registration pursuant to the aforesaid SCN. 3. The petitioner had filed an application for revocation of cancellation of his GST registration, however, that application has not been decided as yet. 4. This petition was listed on 05.09.2023. On the said date, a statement was made by Mr Ohja, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2, that an order had been passed pursuant to the petitioner’s application for revocation of the order cancelling his GST registration, and that the petitioner had not placed the copy of the same on record. 5. Mr. Anurag Ojha now states that his statement, as recorded in the order dated 05.09.2023, is ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
29
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).