^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

S.K.S. TRADERS vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX AND OTHERS.
(Andhra Pradesh High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
HARINATH.N

Pet. Counsel

J.n Venkata Suresh Kumar.

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	S.K.S. TRADERS
Respondent	ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX AND OTHERS.
Court	Andhra Pradesh High Court
State	Andhra Pradesh
Date	Sep 18, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO: 26244/2023
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11134
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 107

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER PER (HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO) Heard Sri J.N. Venkata Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned G.P. for Commercial Tax for the respondents. 2. The petitioner had suffered an order of assessment, under the A.P. Goods and Services Tax, 2017 (for short GST Act), issued by the 2nd respondent dated 13.01.2023. Under this order of assessment, the petitioner was declared to be liable to pay Rs. 2,84,10,044/-. 3. The 2nd respondent for recovery of the said amounts, had initiated proceedings whereby attachment order in FORM GST DRC-22, dated 03.11.2022 and Garnishee notice in FORM GST DRC-13, dated 20.04.2023, were issued to respondents 3 to 5. 4. The petitioner had approached respondents 1 and 2, by way of a representation dated 07.07.2023, contending that the petitioner had filed an appeal against the said order of assessment and had also paid 10% of the disputed tax, as required under Section 107 of the Central Go....