^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RUSTOMJEE REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

B.P. COLABAWALLA
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA

Pet. Counsel

Gopal Mundhra

Economic Laws Practice

Res. Counsel

M.p. Sharma

Mamta Omle

Petitioner / Applicant	RUSTOMJEE REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Apr 1, 2025
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO. 4982 OF 2024
Citation	2025(4) TAXREPLY 12851
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
P. C. 1. Mentioned out of turn. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith at the request of and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties and heard finally. 3. The Petition challenges the Order-in-Appeal No. SK/84/Appeals-II/ME/2024-25 dated 30th June 2024 by which the Petitioner’s Appeal before Respondent No. 2 was dismissed, inter alia, on the ground that the authorized signatory of the Petitioner did not sign the same. Respondent No. 2 held that since no proof, such as a board resolution was produced, it could not accept the Appeal instituted by the authorized signatory. 4. In almost identical circumstances, this Court has entertained and allowed several Petitions where appeals were rejected by the same Officer because they were not instituted or signed by the authorized signatories. 5. In this regard, we have perused Orders of this Court dated 22nd August, 2024 in Writ Petition (L) No. 26123 of 2024, 13th August 2024 in Writ Petition....