^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RENKANNA STEELS vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) CHENNA
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

J.ashish

Res. Counsel

G.nanmaran

Petitioner / Applicant	RENKANNA STEELS
Respondent	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) CHENNA
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Aug 2, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 18470 of 2024 and W. M. P. Nos. 20258 & 20259 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 11024
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order in original dated 10.11.2023 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner asserts that the show cause notice and other communications were uploaded in the “View Additional Notices” tab on the GST portal and, therefore, the petitioner was unaware of these proceedings until recently. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the confirmed tax proposal proceeds on the basis that the outward supply turnover of the petitioner was Rs.1,20,27,343/- during the relevant financial year, where as, he submits that the outward supply value was more than Rs.6 crores. He seeks an opportunity to place the relevant documents before the assessing officer. On instructions, learned counsel submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. 3. Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader, a....