^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

K. R. SHRIRAM
JITENDRA JAIN

Pet. Counsel

Prasad Paranjape

Res. Counsel

Sangeeta Yadav.

Petitioner / Applicant	RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Sep 20, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION(ST) NO. 28724 OF 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11016
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 107

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
P.C. : 1. This petition has been filed challenging an order-in-appeal No. SK/150/Appeals-II/ME/2024-25 dated 5th July 20204. 2. The only ground on which the order-in-appeal dated 5th July 2024 dismissing petitioner’s appeal was passed is that petitioner has not provided any acceptable evidence to prove that date of communication of order-in-original dated 26th December 2023 impugned in the said appeal was 29th December 2023 and hence the appeal was considered to have been filed beyond 3 months from the date of communication of the order impugned in the said appeal. 3. Admittedly, petitioner was never put to notice to prove the date of receipt of the impugned order-in-original dated 26th December 2023 by the Appellate Authority. We find from Page 134 of the Petition that Superintendent, Adjudication (Hqr), CGST & CEX, Mumbai vide his email dated 29th December 2023 had emailed the order to petitioner. This evidences the date of communication of the order to be 29....