^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RAVI TAPARIA vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

T.S. SIVAGNANAM
BIVAS PATTANAYAK

Pet. Counsel

Himangshu Kumar Ray

Piyas Chowdhury

Subhasis Podder

Res. Counsel

T. M. Siddiqui

T. Chakraborty

S. Sanyal

Petitioner / Applicant	RAVI TAPARIA
Respondent	THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	Sep 24, 2024
Order No.	M. A. T. 1850 of 2024 With IA No. CAN 1 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 12078
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) 1. This intra-Court appeal by the writ petitioner is directed against the order dated 4th September, 2024 in W.P.A. No.17838 of 2024. By the said order, the learned writ court relegated the appellant to avail the alternate remedy of preferring an appeal before the appellate authority. However, the appellant is aggrieved by the direction to pay a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- as cost to the respondent authorities. 2. In our view, the order directing the appellant to approach the appellate authority does not call for interference. However, we are of the view that instead of directing payment of cost to the respondent of Rs. 5,00,000/-, the appellant shall deposit the said amount before the adjudicating authority and the said deposit shall be treated as the requisite pre-deposit for entertaining the appeal by the appellate authority. 3. The appeal shall be presented within a period of six weeks from the dat....