Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

RAVI NANDAN vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Pet. Counsel
Surya Parkash
Res. Counsel
Samina Dhir

Petitioner / Applicant

RAVI NANDAN
Respondent STATE OF PUNJAB
Court Punjab and Haryana High Court
State

Punjab

Date Sep 22, 2020
Order No.

CRM-M-28797-2020

Citation

2020(9) TAXREPLY 3379
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

1. The present petition is filed being aggrieved of order dated 11th September, 2020 rejecting the prayer of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 8, dated 21st August, 2020 under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 7, 7(a) and 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, registered at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Phase-1, Mohali. 2. The FIR was result of information received by the vigilance bureau that person namely Vijay Kumar resident of Khanna is working in the filed of transportation within cities of Khanna, Ludhiana and others. He had been indulging in the tax evasion in connivance with the officers/ officials of Excise and Taxation Department. It is alleged that the tax was being evaded by ensuring that there is no checking or verification of the documents or the goods while being transported to and from State of Punjab. Heavy monthly amount were being paid as bribe to the officers and officials of taxation department. It....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)