^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RAMU MEDICAL FOUNDATION vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) (GST) APPEAL & OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

N. ANAND VENKATESH

Pet. Counsel

B. Raveendran

Res. Counsel

G. Nanmaran

Petitioner / Applicant	RAMU MEDICAL FOUNDATION
Respondent	THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) (GST) APPEAL & OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 19, 2024
Order No.	Writ Petition No. 27625 of 2024 And WMP. No. 30142 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11152
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 09.07.2024 passed by the first respondent dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appeal was filed even beyond the condonable period of limitation and that there is no provision in the Tamil Nadu Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 to condone the delay and entertain the appeal. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader accepting notice for the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the assessment order dated 07.12.2023 was issued by the second respondent alleging a mismatch between GSTR - 3B and GSTR - 1 to the tune of Rs. 2,67,398/- towards tax, interest and penalty. Aggrieved by the said order of assessment, the petitioner filed an appeal before the first respondent on 04.6.2024 along with a petition to condone the delay in filing the appeal. However, the appeal itself came to be dismissed by the first respondent by the....