Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

RAMESH KUMAR PATODIA vs. CITY BANK & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

I. P. MUKERJI
BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Pet. Counsel
Ramesh Kumar Patodia
Res. Counsel
Prabhat Kr. Srivastava
Ankita Singh
K. K. Maiti

Petitioner / Applicant

RAMESH KUMAR PATODIA

Respondent CITY BANK & OTHERS
Court Calcutta High Court
State

West Bengal

Date Jul 25, 2023
Order No.

APO 10 of 2023 With WPO 547 of 2019

Citation

2023(7) TAXREPLY 7648

Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

I. P. MUKERJI, J.:- This case is not of the ordinary kind. Most interesting points are involved in it. The appellant writ petitioner (the appellant) has argued this case remarkably well in person. The facts are these. At the material time, the appellant had a credit card provided by Citi Bank (the respondent bank). On 21st February and 28th February, 2019 the respondent bank offered a loan of Rs. 6,50,000/- being “increased pay lite loan” to him for 12 months with interest @ 13% per annum payable in 12 equated monthly instalments. The loan amount was disbursed by the bank by an account payee cheque. The date of advancement of loan was 2nd March, 2019. The equated monthly instalment (EMI) amount was Rs.58,050/-. From the statement enclosed by the appellant at Pg. 68A of the paper book, it appears that with the payment of EMIs, the interest amount in each EMI gradually reduced. At the start, the interest amount in the first EMI was Rs.7,041.44/-. In the las....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
25
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Jun

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for May 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).