^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RAMASWAMY PRABHAAR vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER (FAC) , THUCKALAY.
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C. SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

M. Sudalaimuthu

Res. Counsel

R. Suresh Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	RAMASWAMY PRABHAAR
Respondent	THE STATE TAX OFFICER (FAC) , THUCKALAY.
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 19, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (MD) No. 12979 of 2024 And W. M. P. (MD) No. 11517 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10001
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This Writ Petition is disposed of at the time of admission after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 23.06.2023 passed under Section 73 of TNGST Act, 2017 for the assessment year 2018-19. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was unaware of the notice that preceded the impugned order as also the impugned order that can be passed on 23.06.2023. 4. It is further submitted that out of the total tax liability of Rs. 24,55,520/-, the respondent has recovered a sum of Rs. 22,83,579/-. To that effect, a reference has been made in para 15 of the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition, which reads as under: “15. I submit that now the impugned proceedings have been issued mulcting, by the respondent with huge demand of taxes. The respondent had encashed sum of Rs. 22,83,579/- agaisnt the demand ....