Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

RAKESH GARG vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Pet. Counsel
Sirdhar Potaraju
Res. Counsel
Tanushree Gupta

Petitioner / Applicant

RAKESH GARG
Respondent STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Court Punjab and Haryana High Court
State

Punjab

Date Mar 12, 2021
Order No.

CRM-M-32331-2020

Citation

2021(3) TAXREPLY 3998
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)
Related Tags :

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing of FIR No.321, dated 19.07.2019, under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 50, Gurugram (Annexure P-1) along with consequential proceedings arising therefrom. It has been inter alia contended that no doubt petitioner was the Managing Director of M/s Moksh Alloys Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram (hereinafter referred to as 'the Company'), but he had submitted his resignation as such on 05.01.2018, which had duly been communicated to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs on 13th January, 2018. Thereafter, the petitioner had no role to play in the affairs of the Company. In support thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner has invited the attention of this Court to Annexure P-2 (Colly), which are the copies of the Form No. DIR 11, DIR 12 and certain other relevant documents. It was also submitted that the company ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)