^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RAJKUMAR vs. DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

Pet. Counsel

T.r.ramesh

Res. Counsel

V.prashanth Kiran

Petitioner / Applicant	RAJKUMAR
Respondent	DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Aug 12, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 21253 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 23209 & 23212 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10566
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 12.12.2023 passed by the respondent. 2. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner used to receive advance and supply the products. Under these circumstances, the GST came into force with effect from 01.07.2017 and hence, the petitioner discharged their GST on the supplies made by them from 01.07.2017 for the financial year April 2017 to March 2018. At this juncture, the show cause notice was issued by the respondent stating that there was a difference between the tax supplies reported in Form GSTR 3B as against the Form 26AS for the period of July 2017 to March 2018. Pursuant to the said notice, the petitioner has filed a reply stating that the aforesaid difference ha....