^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RAJENDRA KUMAR vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
PRASHANT KUMAR

Pet. Counsel

Bidhan Chandra Rai

Res. Counsel

Ishan Deo Giri

Petitioner / Applicant	RAJENDRA KUMAR
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Jul 3, 2024
Order No.	Writ - C No. - 19178 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10129
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Bidhan Chandra Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, Sri Ishan Deo Giri, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 & 3 - U.P. Expressways Industrial Development Authority. 2. The present writ petition is preferred praying inter alia with the following relief: "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent 2 to consider the representation issued by the petitioner to the respondent 2 and direct the respondent 2 to pass appropriate order and consequently direct the respondent 2 to remit the additional GST component to the petitioner within a reasonable specified period, as may be deemed fit and proper by the Hon'ble High Court;" 3. It appears from the record that the petitioner, a registered firm under the GST regime engaged primarily in civil construction for govern....