^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RAJAT FOODS INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER-1, CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

N.ANAND VENKATESH

Pet. Counsel

P.vikramkumar

Res. Counsel

G.nanmaran

Petitioner / Applicant	RAJAT FOODS INDIA
Respondent	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER-1, CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 19, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 27043 of 2024 And WMP Nos. 29561 & 29563 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11227
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Considering the limited issue involved in this writ petition, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing on consent given by either side. 2.This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 09.11.2023 on the ground that the order was passed without affording an opportunity and in violation of principles of natural justice. 3.Heard Mr.P.Vikramkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader (Tax) for respondents. 4.The case of the petitioner is that they are registered tax payers and they have been filing monthly returns and remitting tax properly as per the TNGST Act, 2017. 5.On 08.06.2023, a notice came to be issued by the respondent alleging that there was mismatch of input tax claim under Section 73(5) of the Act. 6.The grievance of the petitioner is that they had an accountant and the entire documents were available with the accountant and since ....