^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

PUSHPAM MARKETING vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER, THANJAVUR
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C. SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

A. Satheesh Murugan

Res. Counsel

R. Suresh Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	PUSHPAM MARKETING
Respondent	THE STATE TAX OFFICER, THANJAVUR
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 5, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (MD) No. 11740 of 2024 And W. M. P. (MD) Nos. 10481 and 10482 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10147
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This Writ Petition is disposed of at the time of admission after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2. By the impugned order, the respondent has confirmed the demand proposed in GST DRC-01A dated 24.09.2023 bearing Ref.No.ZD330923164699S and GST DRC-01 dated 29.09.2023 bearing Ref.No.ZD330923246551F. 3. The petitioner's case is that the petitioner has explained the purported discrepancy in the returns filed in GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. However, without considering the same, the respondent has passed the impugned order. 4. The Writ Petition is opposed by the learned Additional Government Pleader on the ground that the petitioner has an alternate remedy and therefore, the petitioner should be asked to work out the alternate remedy before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017. 5. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for t....