^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

PSX TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE PROPER OFFICER/THE DEPUTY TAX OFFICER-2, ETTAYAPURAM
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C.SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

S.muthu Kumar Raja

Res. Counsel

R.suresh Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	PSX TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent	THE PROPER OFFICER/THE DEPUTY TAX OFFICER-2, ETTAYAPURAM
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 18, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (MD) No. 12808 of 2024 And W. M. P. (MD) Nos. 11383 and 11385 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 9999
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 30.04.2024 passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. The impugned order precedes the notice in DRC 01A dated 14.12.2023 and the show cause notice in DRC-01 dated 29.01.2024, in which it is stated that the petitioner has replied on 17.08.2022. Thereafter, the petitioner has also been issued with personal hearing notices. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order although the petitioner has an alternate remedy. 3. It is noticed that the impugned order is dated 30.04.2024 and the present writ petition has been filed on 07.06.2024 well within the period of limitation prescribed under Section 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017 to file an appeal. 4. I find no merit in the challenge to the impugned order in this writ petition, as there are no procedural violations that have been pointed out in the impugned order. Therefore, the Writ Petition stands disposed of by directing the petit....