^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

PROFESSIONAL CAR DECORS vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST & C. EX., CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

Pet. Counsel

S. Akila

Res. Counsel

Rajnish Pathiyil

Petitioner / Applicant	PROFESSIONAL CAR DECORS
Respondent	THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST & C. EX., CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 12, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 26367 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 28822 & 28823 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11225
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order of Rejection of Application for Revocation of Cancellation of GST Registration issued by the respondent dated 16.08.2024 and to direct the respondent to restore the GST Registration of the petitioner. 2. Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil, learned Senior Panel Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the documents pertaining to the property tax, the Door Number of the petitioner's place of business was mentioned as 67. However, as per the rental agreement, the aforesaid Door No.67 was internally divided and the 1st floor, which was stated as 67A, was alloted to the petitioner's sister, whereas, the 2nd floor, which was stated as 67B, was alloted to the petitioner. Hence, in the GST Portal, the Door Number of the petitioner's place ....