^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

PRIMEONE WORKFORCE PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ALOK MATHUR

Pet. Counsel

Anupam Mishra

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

A.s.g.i.

Petitioner / Applicant	PRIMEONE WORKFORCE PVT. LTD.
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Sep 13, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 232 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 10950
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Bharat Rai Chandani, Advocate along with Shri Anupam Mishra, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Sanjay Sarin, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent no. 1 to 4, Shri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for Union of India and perused the material available on record. 2. The petitioner in the present writ petition has challenged the order dated 08.08.2024 passed by Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal)-1, Lucknow whereby he has held that appeal preferred by the petitioner without depositing 10% of the disputed amount would not be maintainable and has also rejected the application for interim relief. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh and is primarily engaged in supply of manpower services to various government and non-government corporation in ....