^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

PRAVEEN KUMAR vs. STATE OF HARYANA
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

N.S. SHEKHAWAT

Pet. Counsel

Ankur Lal

Res. Counsel

Sheenu Sura

Petitioner / Applicant	PRAVEEN KUMAR
Respondent	STATE OF HARYANA
Court	Punjab and Haryana High Court
State	Punjab
Date	Aug 10, 2023
Order No.	CRM-M-37122-2023
Citation	2023(8) TAXREPLY 7780
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
N.S. SHEKHAWAT J. (ORAL) Reply by way of an affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rohtak, has been filed on behalf of the respondent-State and the same is taken on record. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. with a prayer to grant regular bail in case FIR No. 4 dated 06.01.2019 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC and Section 132(1)(B)(C) of HGST Act, 2017, at Police Station Arya Nagar Rohtak, District Rohtak. As per the prosecution, the FIR in the present case was got registered by the Excise and Taxation Officer by alleging that the petitioner is creating false and bogus companies for extracting GST amount from the public. It was further alleged that he was issuing fake bills and had not deposited various amounts in the GST Department and caused a loss of Rs. 10,233,769/- to the Department. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has not been named in the present case....