Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

PRAMOD AGARWAL, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS vs. ARIHANT SUPERSTRUCTURES LIMITED
(National Anti Profiteering Authority)

Hon'ble Judges:

ARMAND SHAH
PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH
HITESH SHAH
Pet. Counsel
Pramod Agarwal
Res. Counsel
Deepak Bholusaria
Arpit Haldia
Ravindra Parakh

Petitioner / Applicant

PRAMOD AGARWAL, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS
Respondent ARIHANT SUPERSTRUCTURES LIMITED
Court

NAA (National Anti Profiteering Authority)

Date Jul 6, 2022
Order No.

34/2022

Citation

2022(7) TAXREPLY 6064
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 26.11.2020 had been furnished by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 09.10.2019 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed by the Applicant No. 1 under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules. 2017, alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of Flat No. BENECIA-4-301 in the Respondents project “Arihant Aanchal”, situated at Jaisalmer Bye Pass Road, Near Dalt Bai Circle, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. The Applicant No, 1 had alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in price against payments due to him. 2. The DGAP has reported that the Applicant No 1 also stated that the Respondent was charging 18% GST instead of 12% and taking ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
29
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S