^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

PODHIGAI MOTORS vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , PALAYAMKOTTAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C. SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

A.thiyagarajan

Res. Counsel

R.suresh Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	PODHIGAI MOTORS
Respondent	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , PALAYAMKOTTAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 20, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (MD) No. 13232 of 2024 And W. M. P. (MD)Nos. 11713 & 11714 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10002
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 26.03.2024 passed under Section 161 of TNGST Act, 2017. The petitioner had, earlier, suffered by an assessment order dated 29.12.2023 for the assessment period of 2017-18. The petitioner had, earlier, filed a reply to the show cause notice that preceded the aforesaid order. 3. According to the petitioner, there were certain mistakes in the said order dated 29.12.2023 and therefore the petitioner filed application under Section 161 of TNGST Act, 2017 for rectification of the order. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was not heard and therefore, there is a violation of Principles of Natural Justice while passing the impugned order dated 26.03.2024. 5. It is noticed that the impugned order dated 26.03.2024 passed by the respondent, though is reasoned it has been p....