^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ORION SECURITY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. vs. SENIOR JOINT COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, DHARMATALA CIRCLE & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

NIZAMUDDIN

Pet. Counsel

J. P. Khaitan

Rishi Raju

Mrigank Kejriwal

Res. Counsel

A. Ray

T. M. Siddiqui

T. Chakraborty

Petitioner / Applicant	ORION SECURITY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.
Respondent	SENIOR JOINT COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, DHARMATALA CIRCLE & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	Oct 5, 2023
Order No.	WPA 23005 of 2023
Citation	2023(10) TAXREPLY 8063
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned orders in original dated 12th March, 2022, and the impugned orders of the appellate authority dated 20th April, 2023, dismissing the appeals in question of the petitioner on the ground of inordinate delay of 9 months. Mr. Khaitan, learned senior advocate representing the petitioner submits that the impugned adjudication orders were ex parte and the reason for not participating in the impugned adjudication proceeding as well as delay in filing the appeals against the impugned adjudication orders were due to lapse and laches on the part of the petitioner’s tax consultant Mr. A. K. Sidhwani, who according to the petitioner failed to inform the petitioner with regard to receipt of show-cause notices which were sent to the said consultant in his mail address and the said tax consultant also miserably failed to pursue the impugned adjudication proceeding....