^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

OMKARA FOOTWEAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANOTHER
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
AMIT MAHAJAN

Pet. Counsel

Rakesh Kumar

Res. Counsel

Vijay Joshi

Petitioner / Applicant	OMKARA FOOTWEAR
Respondent	COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANOTHER
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Oct 19, 2023
Order No.	W.P.(C) 16263/2022
Citation	2023(10) TAXREPLY 8219
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

Related Tags :

☍

Section 107

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a common order dated 10.12.2021 (hereafter ‘the impugned order’), whereby the appeals preferred by the petitioner (Appeal No. 160- GST/Appeal-1/North/2021, Appeal No. 161- GST/Appeal-1/North/2021 & Appeal No. 162- GST/Appeal-1/North/2021), each dated 13.07.2021 were rejected. The petitioner had preferred the said appeals impugning three separate orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority all dated 28.09.2020, whereby the respective applications filed by the petitioner seeking refund for the period January, 2020 to March, 2020, were rejected. 2. The petitioner had preferred three applications seeking refund of an aggregate amount of Rs.18,00,202/-(Rs.7,74,776/- in respect of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Rs.10,55,426/- in respect of State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) for the period January, 2020 to March, 2020. 3. The petitioner received three sepa....