^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

NITIN SINGH BHATI vs. UNION OF INDIA
(Madhya Pradesh High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

S.C. SHARMA
SHAILENDRA SHUKLA

Pet. Counsel

Nitin Singh Bhati

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	NITIN SINGH BHATI
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA
Court	Madhya Pradesh High Court
State	Madhya Pradesh
Date	Sep 23, 2020
Order No.	WP No.13918/2020
Citation	2020(9) TAXREPLY 4303
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
The petitioner before this court a practicing advocate has filed this present petition by way of Public Interest Litigation. The contention of the petitioner is that a criminal case was registered against certain persons in the township of Indore i.e. Crime No. 23 of 2020 for offences u/s 132(1) (s) of GST Act, 2017 read with 409, 467, 471 and 120-B of IPC. Five persons were granted regular bail by order dated 27-07-2020 and 13-08-2020. The petitioner's grievance is that in respect of one of the co-accused, namely, Sanjay Matta as charge sheet was not filed within time an application was preferred u/s 167 (2) of Cr.PC and the same has been allowed by the trial court vide order dated 03-09-2020. The petitioner's contention is that grant of bail to one of the co-accused as investigation was not completed is against public interest and the Investigating Agency should have completed the investigation, within time. In the considered opinion of this court the present p....