^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

NIRAKAR RAMCHANDRA PRADHAN vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

G.S. KULKARNI
JITENDRA JAIN

Pet. Counsel

Roshil Nichani

Nikhil Rungta

Res. Counsel

Subir Kumar

Sruti Kalyanikar

Janhavi Hirlekar

Petitioner / Applicant	NIRAKAR RAMCHANDRA PRADHAN
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Sep 11, 2023
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO.2534 OF 2023
Citation	2023(9) TAXREPLY 7977
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORAL ORDER (PER G. S. KULKARNI, J.): 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has firstly challenged the show cause notice dated 27th July 2022 issued by the respondents calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why the registration of the petitioner under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘CGST Act) should not be cancelled. The said show cause notice also records that the registration of the petitioner stands suspended w.e.f. 27th July 2022. There is no dispute on the petitioner having received the show cause notice on the even day. 2. The show cause notice was replied by the petitioner on 31st July 2022. In his reply, the petitioner interalia raised a contention that the show cause notice does not furnish any reason whatsoever and more particularly when serious allegation of a fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts was being made against the petitioner. On such show cause not....