^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

NILGIRIS SILVERLINE BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER - 2 OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER GUDALUR ASSESSMENT CIRCLE & OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

Pet. Counsel

T. R. Ramesh

Res. Counsel

Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran

Petitioner / Applicant	NILGIRIS SILVERLINE BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent	THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER - 2 OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER GUDALUR ASSESSMENT CIRCLE & OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Feb 12, 2025
Order No.	W. P. No. 4718 of 2025 and W. M. P. Nos. 5239 and 5240 of 2025
Citation	2025(2) TAXREPLY 12589
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 16

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner/taxpayer, who is registered dealer on the file of the respondent-Department under the provisions of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act)/ Central Goods and Services Tax Act ( CGST Act) as the case may be, challenging the order passed by the respondent-Department, whereby, the claim of ITC was reversed/negatived and consequently, the petitioner has been directed to pay tax/penalty/interest. 2. As the issue involved in this Writ Petition, is identical in nature and the relief sought thereunder, is interconnected, this Writ Petition is being disposed of, with the same lines. 3. When this Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondent, would submit that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition, has been squarely covered by the common order of this Court, dated 17.10.2024 passed in W.P.Nos.25081 of 2023, etc., batch, wherein,....