^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

NATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE OF INDIA vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
SANJEEV NARULA

Pet. Counsel

Karan Sachdev

Kunal Kapoor

Res. Counsel

Farman Ali

Petitioner / Applicant	NATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE OF INDIA
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Jan 19, 2021
Order No.	W.P.(C) 10795/2020
Citation	2021(1) TAXREPLY 3807
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 140

☍

Rule 117

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
CM APPL. 33850/2020 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 10795/2020 3. Respondents have not filed a counter affidavit despite opportunity granted to them. Today, Mr. Farman Ali, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents seeks further time for doing so. However, having regard to the nature of controversy arising in the present petition, need is not felt to grant further time to the respondents to file the counter affidavit. Further, we may also note that in several other matters comprising of a batch, counter-affidavits had not been filed, and the coordinate Bench of this court, to which one of us (Sanjeev Narula J.) is a member, has already heard the arguments and reserved the judgment. Accordingly we are proceeding to decide the present petition on the basis of the available record and the submissions made by the counsels. 4. By way of the present petition, directions are sought....