^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

N.G.K INFRA VENTURES PVT. LTD. & OTHERS vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ALOK MATHUR
ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL

Pet. Counsel

Manoj Kumar Mishra

Piyush Tripathi

Shrikant Chaudhary

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	N.G.K INFRA VENTURES PVT. LTD. & OTHERS
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Jun 25, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 167 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10045
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.12.2023, passed u/s 73 of U.P.GST/CGST/IGST Act, 2017 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector, Sector 12, Lucknow, whereby imposing tax for an amount of Rs. 1,20,95,308.21, amount which includes the interest and penalty due upon the petitioner. 3. The petitioner submitted that he has assailed the said order on the ground that the same has been passed in violation of the statutory provision as well as no opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner before passing of the said order. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand has opposed the writ petition. He has submitted that notice was duly served upon the petitioner who despite service of notice did not appear before the authority to defend the said notice and accordingly the impu....