^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MUKUL MITTAL vs. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MUKTA GUPTA

Pet. Counsel

Ramesh Gupta

Bhuvnesh Satija

Vibhooti Malhotra

Res. Counsel

Ravi Prakash

Neeraj

Petitioner / Applicant	MUKUL MITTAL
Respondent	DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Feb 3, 2021
Order No.	BAIL APPLN. 168/2021
Citation	2021(2) TAXREPLY 3823
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 132

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
The hearing has been conducted through Video Conferencing. 1. By the present petition, the petitioner seeks regular bail pursuant to the Arrest Memo dated 9th December, 2020 for offence punishable under Section 132 (1)(i) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner filed an anticipatory bail before the learned Sessions Judge on 27.10.2020 where a statement was made that investigation from the petitioner is underway. Thereafter the petitioner appeared repeatedly for joining the investigation. The petitioner was arrested on 9th December, 2020 and no information in this regard was given to the learned Court where the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner was still pending. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that after the petitioner was arrested no custodial investigation was carried out; as the petitioner was sent to the judicial custody on the same day and not even once the petiti....