^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MONONIT DAS vs. STATE TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK
(Orissa High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ARINDAM SINHA
SAHOO

Pet. Counsel

Itishree Tripathy

Res. Counsel

D. Das

S. Mishra

Petitioner / Applicant	MONONIT DAS
Respondent	STATE TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK
Court	Orissa High Court
State	Odisha
Date	Aug 23, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (C) No. 19701 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 11030
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Miss. Tripathy, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 5th July, 2023 followed by order dated 5th August, 2023 cancelling his client’s registration under Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits, his client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) no.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). He submits, his client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order. 2. Mr. Das, learned advocate, Additional Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the department. 3. We reproduce below paragraph 2 from said order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra). “2. In that view of the m....