^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MOHAN ENTERPRISES vs. DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF GST & CENTRAL EXCISE
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

R.hemalatha

Res. Counsel

Sai Srujan Tayi

Petitioner / Applicant	MOHAN ENTERPRISES
Respondent	DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF GST & CENTRAL EXCISE
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 13, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 14650 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 15913 & 15914 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10110
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order in original dated 22.03.2024 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. By asserting that the petitioner's business was discontinued and that the show cause notice and impugned order were uploaded on the GST portal but not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode, the present writ petition was filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposal pertained to a mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto populated GSTR 2A. If provided an opportunity, she submits that the petitioner would be in a position to reconcile the mismatch. On instructions, she submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. 3. Mr.Sai Srujan Tayi, learned senior standing counsel, accepts notice for the respondent. By referring to the impugned order, he points out that principles of natural justice were complied with and t....