^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

METRO ENGINEERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

JASMEET SINGH

Pet. Counsel

Vaijanthi K.

Res. Counsel

None

Petitioner / Applicant	METRO ENGINEERS
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Feb 14, 2025
Order No.	W. P. (CRL) 523/2025
Citation	2025(2) TAXREPLY 12721
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. This is a petition seeking direction for registration of F.I.R. against respondent No. 2 for non-payment of GST and other offences. 2. This is a petition seeking the following prayers: “1. Kindly direct the Respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 26/10/2024, 24/12/2024 issued by the Petitioner for taking appropriate action against the Respondent No. 2; and 2. To register a First Information Report (FIR) against the Respondent No. 1 under Sections 316(1), 318(4), 61(2), 336(1), and 351(2)/(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and any other relevant provisions of law. 3. Direct the Police authorities to initiate a prompt and thorough investigation into the matter and take appropriate action as per the law.” 3. Ms. Vaijanthi K., learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in the present case, the petitioner has made the entire payment to its service provider i.e. respondent No. 2 and despite the agreeme....