^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

METGUD TILES vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS
(Karnataka High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

Pet. Counsel

Ganesh Vishwnath Shandage

Pratima S. Shipurkar

Res. Counsel

Shivaprabhu S. Hiremath

Avinash Angadi

Shivaraj S. Balloli

Petitioner / Applicant	METGUD TILES
Respondent	THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS
Court	Karnataka High Court
State	Karnataka
Date	Jun 10, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO. 105344 OF 2023 ( T-RES )
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 11093
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 16

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents No.1, 4 and 7, learned counsel Sri Avinash Angadi, appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 as well as Sri Shivaraj S. Balloli appearing for respondent No.3. 2. This petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the validity of the impugned order in Appeal bearing No.GST-15/22-23, dated 23.05.2023 passed by respondent No.5 under Section 107(11) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Act, 2017. The petitioner is also seeking an order to quash the impugned demand letter-1 CTO/ (AUDIT)-3/BGV/2023-24/B-314, dated 15.07.2023 (Annexure-O) and impugned endorsement letter-2 CTO/(AUDIT)-3/BGV/ENDORSEMENT/ 2023-24/B-379, dated 10.08.2023 (Annexure-S) of respondent No.7 as being illegal, arbitrary, extra-legislative and contrary to the order in Order No.09/2019-Central Tax, dated 03.12.2019 issued by respondent No.3 (Annexure-W), instructions in Circular No.132/2/2020, dated 18.03.2020 issued by respondent No....