^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MATAJI STORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) COIMBATORE
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

S.p.sri Harini

Adithya Reddy

Res. Counsel

V.prasanth Kiran

Petitioner / Applicant	MATAJI STORE
Respondent	ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) COIMBATORE
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 26, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 11168 of 2024, WMP Nos. 12235 & 12236 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 10846
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order dated 30.09.2023 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. By asserting that the petitioner was unaware of the show cause notice and impugned order because the said communications were only uploaded on the 'View Additional Notices and Order' tab of the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode, the present writ petition was filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposal pertains to discrepancy between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A and that the petitioner would be in a position to explain the discrepancy if provided an opportunity. On instructions, she submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand. 4. Mr. Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondent. He points out that principles of natural justice were com....