^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MARCOWAGON RETAIL PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Gujarat High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

BHARGAV D. KARIA
D.N. RAY

Pet. Counsel

Uchit N Sheth

Res. Counsel

Shrunjal Shah

Ankit Shah

Petitioner / Applicant	MARCOWAGON RETAIL PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Gujarat High Court
State	Gujrat
Date	Apr 24, 2025
Order No.	R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2234 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2236 of 2025
Citation	2025(4) TAXREPLY 13677
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. By these petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 19/11/2024 passed under Section 129 of the Central/State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘the Act’). 2. Learned advocate Mr. Uchit Sheth for the petitioners has tendered the draft amendment. The same is allowed in terms of the draft. The same to be carried out forthwith. 3. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates appearing for the respective parties waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respective respondents. 4. At the outset, it is required to be noted that the petitioners have not stated correct facts in the memo of the petitions and subsequently in affidavit-in-reply, it was pointed out about the transactions. The petitioners have provided the correct facts in the affidavit-in-rejoinder and therefore the fact....