Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

MANJUNATHAA ROCK DRILLS AND T. MURUGESH, PROPRIETOR, ASIAN AGENCIES vs. ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KALPATTA, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, STATE OF KERALA, TAXES (B) DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT AND GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

P.B.SURESH KUMAR
Pet. Counsel
Tomson T.emmanuel
Res. Counsel
V.k. Shamsudeen
Sreelal N. Warrier

Petitioner / Applicant

MANJUNATHAA ROCK DRILLS AND T. MURUGESH, PROPRIETOR, ASIAN AGENCIES
Respondent ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KALPATTA, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, STATE OF KERALA, TAXES (B) DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT AND GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
Court Kerala High Court
State

Kerala

Date May 24, 2018
Order No.

WP(C).No. 15256 of 2018

Citation

2018(5) TAXREPLY 3034
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

The first petitioner purchased certain goods from the State of Tamil Nadu and transported the same to the second petitioner in the State of Kerala. The goods were detained by the first respondent under Section 129 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act (the Act) and the second petitioner was issued Ext.P5(a) notice calling upon him to show cause why Integrated Goods and Service Tax and penalty as indicated therein shall not be paid in respect of the detained goods. Exts.P6 and P6(a) are the objections preferred by the petitioners to P5(a) notice. The grievance of the petitioners in the writ petition concerns the inaction on the part of the second respondent in completing the adjudication provided for under Section 129 of the Act in respect of the goods detained. The petitioners, therefore, seek appropriate directions in this regard in the writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned Government Pleader. Having regard to the facts....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
28
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)