^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MAHANTESH vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS
(Karnataka High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Pet. Counsel

Nagaraj Damodar

Res. Counsel

Adithi M.v

Petitioner / Applicant	MAHANTESH
Respondent	THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS
Court	Karnataka High Court
State	Karnataka
Date	Jul 1, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO. 22377 OF 2019 (GM-TEN)
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 11274
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This petition is filed by the petitioner against the tender notification dated 15.11.2018, issued by respondent No.3 inviting bids for various civil works. Condition No.10 of the tender document stipulated that GST would be paid separately on the contract amount in accordance with the Government order dated 10.10.2018. The petitioner participated in the tender process, emerged as the successful bidder, and was issued a letter of intent dated 14.02.2019. In compliance with the letter of intent, the petitioner provided a fixed deposit towards a bank guarantee amounting to Rs. 6,26,310/- to respondent No.3. 2. Subsequently, respondent No.3 issued a corrigendum dated 25.01.2019, which amended condition No.10 and withdrew the requirement for separate GST payment on the contract amount. The petitioner submitted a representation requesting respondent No.3 to retract the corrigendum and honor the original condition for separate GST payment as stated in the initial tender docum....