Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

M/S. JINMAGAL CORPORATION
(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat)

Hon'ble Judges:

SANJAY SAXENA
MOHIT AGRAWAL
Pet. Counsel
Hem B Chhajed
Res. Counsel
Na

Petitioner / Applicant

M/S. JINMAGAL CORPORATION
Respondent NA
Court

AAR (Authority for Advance Ruling)

State

Gujrat

Date Sep 17, 2020
Order No.

GUJ/GAAR/R/64/2020

Citation

2020(9) TAXREPLY 3738
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

M/s. Jinmagal Corporation, 4, Chintamani Villa Bunglow, B/H. H.H. Patel High School, Ramnagar, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad a partnership firm not having GST Registration, filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the GGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the SGST Act. 2. The applicant submitted that Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as “AUDA”) had carried out e-auction for leasing certain plots for a period of 99 years. The plot so auctioned could be used only for the purpose of construction of commercial projects. 3. The applicant further submitted that they have secured bid for plot No. 265, TP 22, Chandkheda through e-auction conducted by AUDA. They required to pay one time lease premium /salami of ₹ 35,65,85,940/-as one time long term lease premium/ salami as consideration for the said plot. The applicant is also required to pa....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)