^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

M/S. J.J. ENTERPRISES vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
(Jharkhand High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

APARESH KUMAR SINGH
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

Pet. Counsel

Shankar Lal Agarwal

Res. Counsel

Piyush Chitresh

Bharat Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	M/S. J.J. ENTERPRISES
Respondent	THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court	Jharkhand High Court
State	Jharkhand
Date	Oct 6, 2020
Order No.	W. P. (T) No. 3343 of 2018
Citation	2020(10) TAXREPLY 3410
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shankar Lal Agarwal, Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C to leaned Advocate General for the State of Jharkhand and Mr. Bharat Kumar, learned counsel for respondent no. 3- Bharti Airtel Limited through Video Conferencing. Petitioner approached this Court on issuance of notice bearing Reference No. 2469, dated 4.5.2018 (Annexure-8) by the Deputy Commissioner of Estate Tax under GST Act, Jamshedpur Circle, Jamshedpur intimating discrepancy in the return submitted by him which showed that an amount of ₹ 20,31,000/- was not reflected in the return filed by respondent no. 3. He also sought a direction upon the respondent no. 2 to decide upon the issue based upon the reply to show cause filed by the petitioner dated 12th May, 2018, whereunder he had informed respondent no. 2 that though Central GST and State GST has already been collected from the petitioner through its Tax Invoice, but it is not being reflected in the return of the respondent no. 3....