^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

M/S. HYDROLIC CORPORATION KERALA vs. THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

Pet. Counsel

K.dilip

P.rafthas

Res. Counsel

Paul Abraham Vakkanal

Petitioner / Applicant	M/S. HYDROLIC CORPORATION KERALA
Respondent	THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	Aug 11, 2020
Order No.	W.P(C).No.16384 OF 2020
Citation	2020(8) TAXREPLY 3215
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P4 notice issued to him under Section 129 of the GST Act. On a perusal of the detention notice, it is seen that the detention of the vehicle and the goods was on the finding that the goods on inspection were found to be different from those that were covered by the invoice and transportation documents. On a consideration of the reasons shown in Ext.P4, I am of the prima facie view that the detention cannot be said to be unjustified. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to clear the goods on furnishing a bank guarantee to cover the amounts demanded in Ext.P4. Taking note of the said submission, I dispose the writ petition by directing the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner to clear the goods and the vehicle on furnishing a bank guarantee for the amount demanded in Ext.P4. Therea....