Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

M.K.N. COCONUT INDUSTRIES vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C.SARAVANAN
Pet. Counsel
N.viswanathan
Res. Counsel
K.vasanthamala

Petitioner / Applicant

M.K.N. COCONUT INDUSTRIES
Respondent THE STATE TAX OFFICER
Court Madras High Court
State

Tamilnadu

Date Oct 10, 2023
Order No.

W.P.Nos. 14334 And 14341 of 2020 And WMP.Nos.17801, 17803, 17808 & 17810 of 2020

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8113
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

COMMON ORDER By this common order, both these writ petitions are being disposed of. 2. In these writ petitions, the petitioner has challenged the respective orders passed by the respondent, State Tax Officer ( Intelligence) both dated 15.10.2019 in GST INS Regr. Sl.No. 1/2019-20 for the Assessment Years 2017-18 [December 2017 to March 2018] and for the Assessment Year [2018-19 April 2018 to March 2019]. 3. The impugned orders have been passed by the respondent under Section 62 of the TNGST, Act, 2017 in Form GST ASMT-13. Details of demand confirmed vide impugned orders together with interest due from the petitioner are as hereunder :- W.P.No. Assessment Year IGST CGST SGST Total Due ITC as per GSTR-2A 14334/20 2017-2018 27,70,722 ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
30
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).