^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

M.B. TRAVELS vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

M.a. Mudimannan

Res. Counsel

V. Prashanth Kiran

Petitioner / Applicant	M.B. TRAVELS
Respondent	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 5, 2024
Order No.	Writ Petition No. 12181 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 13275 & 13276 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 9957
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order in original dated 20.11.2023 is assailed primarily on the ground of denial of a personal hearing. 2. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the order impugned herein because the notice and order were uploaded on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any of the other modes prescribed in Section 169 of applicable GST enactments. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the impugned order and pointed out that the alleged date of personal hearing is blank in the reference column. Similarly, he submits that the date of personal hearing is blank in the body of the order. On instructions, he submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. 4. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondent. He points out that the impugned order was preceded by a notice in Form ASMT 10 dated 11.07.2023, show ca....