^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

LUPIN LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA
(Gujarat High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

N.V.ANJARIA
BHARGAV D. KARIA

Pet. Counsel

Aditya R Parikh

Bharat Raichandani

Res. Counsel

Krutik Parikh

Priyank Lodha

Petitioner / Applicant	LUPIN LIMITED
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA
Court	Gujarat High Court
State	Gujrat
Date	Jun 29, 2022
Order No.	R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10248 OF 2021
Citation	2022(6) TAXREPLY 6091
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

Related Tags :

☍

Section 7

☍

HSN / SAC Code 9997

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
Heard learned advocate Mr. Bharat Raichandani with learned advocate Mr. Aditya R. Parikh with for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Krutik Parikh for respondent No.2 and learned advocate Mr. Priyank Lodha for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. 2. By invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioner has prayed to call for the records pertaining to the recovery notice dated 28.05.2021 stated to have been issued by respondent No.3- the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Vadodara. It is a further prayer made wanting this Court to go into the validity and legality of the said recovery notice and to hold that long term lease of 99 years is nothing but sale of land and building in terms of Entry 5 of Schedule III to Section 7 of the CGST Act,2017 and that it would not attract the levy of GST. It is further prayed to require the respondent authorities not to effect any recovery pursuant to the said notice. 3. Stating the bare minimum facts, the petition....