Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

LALITHA SUBRAMANIAN vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PRITINKER DIWAKER
ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA
Pet. Counsel
Kalpana Sinha
Res. Counsel
Amit Mahajan
Gopal Verma

Petitioner / Applicant

LALITHA SUBRAMANIAN

Respondent UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Court Allahabad High Court
State

Uttar Pradesh

Date Nov 7, 2023
Order No.

Writ Tax No. - 1137 of 2023

Citation

2023(11) TAXREPLY 8263
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER Heard Sri Utkarsh Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Amit Mahajan, learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 4 and Sri Gopal Verma, learned counsel, who has appeared for the Union of India. The challenge in this writ petition is to the demand cum show cause notice dated 26.03.2021 issued by the Respondent No.3, Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax, Division-I, E-23B, Sector-8, Noida, as also the consequential order dated 27.02.2023 passed by the Respondent No.2, Principal Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Commissionerate, Noida , C-56/42, Sector-62, Noida, whereby and whereunder M/s TSR Subramanian, a Sole Proprietorship Firm run by the husband of the petitioner namely late Sri T.S.R. Subramanian, engaged in providing services as a Consultant has been saddled with tax liability of Rs. 8,97,716/- under the proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Sections 142, 173, 174 of the Central Goods & ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
1
Jul
S
M
T
W
T
F
S