^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

KRUPESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI PATEL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
(Gujarat High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MENGDEY

Pet. Counsel

Apurva N Mehta

Res. Counsel

Himanshu Patel

Petitioner / Applicant	KRUPESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI PATEL
Respondent	STATE OF GUJARAT
Court	Gujarat High Court
State	Gujrat
Date	Aug 14, 2024
Order No.	R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE CHARGESHEET) NO. 15796 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10576
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORAL ORDER 1. Draft amendment is allowed and same is carried out forthwith. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State. 2. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for regular bail in connection with Memorandum of Arrest File No. ACST/FSU-5/M/s. KEPCO ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED, KRUPESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI PATEL/2024-25/B.05, Dated 27.06.2024 registered with Ld. Asst. Commissioner, FSU – 5, Ahmedabad. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. 4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State vehemently submits that the present applicant had shown fictitious transactions with 69 firms and upon inquiry of those 38 fictitious firms, the transactions which were being shown by the present applicant were fictitious and no such fi....