^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

KODAI AUTOMOBILES LIMITED vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) & OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C. SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

Raja. Karthikeyan

Res. Counsel

J.k. Jayaselan

Petitioner / Applicant	KODAI AUTOMOBILES LIMITED
Respondent	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) & OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 27, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (MD) No. 13799 of 2024 And W. M. P. (MD)No. 12142 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10330
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 28.12.2023 bearing reference in GSTIN:33AABCK1651R1ZC passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2017-18. The impugned order has preceded the notice, which has been replied by the petitioner and the personal hearing which has been appeared by the petitioner. However, the petitioner has not filed statutory appeal in time. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. The above submission is opposed by the learned Government Advocate for the respondent, on the ground that the Writ Petition is hopelessly time barred and therefore, liable to be dismissed, on account of latches, in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU, Kakinada and others vs. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited reported in 2020 SCC Online SC....