^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

KM WEDDING EVENTS MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

R.anish Kumar

Res. Counsel

K.vasanthamala

Petitioner / Applicant	KM WEDDING EVENTS MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.
Respondent	THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jul 8, 2024
Order No.	W. P. Nos. 16394 & 16397 of 2024 and W. M. P. Nos. 17954 & 17956 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 11285
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
COMMON ORDER Against the order dated 30.06.2023 of the State Tax officer for assessment years 2019-20 and 2020-21, the petitioner filed an appeal before the appellate authority on 21.11.2023. According to the petitioner, such appeal was filed within the four month period with in which delay could be condoned if reckoned from the date of receipt of the order on 22.07.2023. In view of the rejection of such appeal on the ground of limitation, these writ petitions were filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's GST registration was cancelled. Consequently, he submits that the petitioner was unable to access the GST portal. The order in original was communicated to the petitioner by e-mail on 22.07.2023 and, if computed from the said date, learned counsel submits that the appeal should not have been rejected on the ground of limitation. 3. Mrs. K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondent. She submits that ....